Otavio Salvador dijo [Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:53:56PM -0300]: > >> There is no technical reason why this has to be a makefile. I propose: > > > > What is the use case of the change? I already see enough "bad code" > > right now, and it would only get worse if people start to write their > > make file in lets say ruby. > > While I agree with you that majority of people might do bad code I > also think that some very complicated packages (OO, X, Kernel and > like) can use it and make maintainers life easier.
Maybe we should keep a recommendation for people to write makefiles, for ease of maintainability - but we should not keep it as a requeriment. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
