Sean Whitton wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:07:01AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Otherwise, how about something along these lines: [...] > > Commenting on Charles' patch, I think that it would be clearer to have > the 'should' and 'must' requirements in separate sentences. > > Thus I am seeking seconds for the following patch: > > diff --git a/policy/ch-source.rst b/policy/ch-source.rst > index f706a13..89b355a 100644 > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst > @@ -99,10 +99,11 @@ later reconfigure the package without losing the changes > you made. > Debian changelog: ``debian/changelog`` > -------------------------------------- > > -Changes in the Debian version of the package should be briefly explained > -in the Debian changelog file ``debian/changelog``. [#]_ This includes > -modifications made in the Debian package compared to the upstream one as > -well as other changes and updates to the package. [#]_ > +Every source package must include the Debian changelog file, > +``debian/changelog``. Changes in the Debian version of the package > +should be briefly explained in this file. [#]_ This includes > +modifications made in the Debian package compared to the upstream one > +as well as other changes and updates to the package. [#]_ > > The format of the ``debian/changelog`` allows the package building tools > to discover which version of the package is being built and find out Seconded. Thanks for tying up this loose end. Sincerely, Jonathan