Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free

[truename]

[snip]

>I too would be forced to use another dist if the non-free software was no
>longer maintained by debian.

this is wrong. Redhat only have ONE cd as their well-organized
distro, other packages are added by others (even w/o a policy
for quality), while Debian, even the GR passed, could still
gives you more. (3rd parties could still give you the packages
you needed.)

So your point on anti-the-GR is meanless here.
(BTW, i'm still thinking about the GR, and get some
enlightenments from both side, and I appreciate
it. But obviouslly here quite some meaningless
arguments against the GR here.)


___________________________________________________________________
新鲜热辣的潮流资讯，网易新辣Channel： http://spicy.163.com
闪客精品，尽在网易FLASH站： http://desktop.163.com/flash


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]