"R. Armiento" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just want to bring bug #311683 to "public awareness" and
You reported it yesterday. Why bounce it so soon? > discussion. Since it is a bit of a "sociopolitcal" and policy > issue, I suspect there may be people out there who feel > strongly about this one way or the other, and with Policy issue? Which bit of policy? I searched debian-policy for porn and didn't find any. > the upcoming release of debian sarge, it might not be optimal > if this feature makes it out to the official release "under > the radar" without being publically discussed. There's a bug open about it. I doubt the release will be held for a new kdebase-bin now, though. > The issue is: > 1. The WebCollage screensaver "...makes collages out of > random images pulled off of the World Wide Web. It finds > these images by doing random web searches...". The result is > a screensaver that often shows sexually explicit images. [...] Can you quantify "often" please? Really, any site that gives a toss about accidental images should be using a filtering proxy, IMO, so I don't agree that this should lose anyone their job. normal not important. -- MJ Ray (slef), K. Lynn, England, email see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]