On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Peter Makholm wrote: > Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > fixing bugs, to simply closing them in the BTS. Sometimes, it's good to > > keep bugs open in the BTS (tagged w/ wontfix, documenting a problem that > > other people may bring up; or tagged w/ unreproducable, as another > > [...] > > Of course this shouldn't change the way we use the BTS. If people > misuse the BTS and close bugs which isn't really fixed or really > proved as non-bugs they shouldn't get credited for the close. We might > even let it have a negative impact on their status.
"might"? We *should*. > - Destructive help - This person shouldn't ever touch my packages again Heh. Someone fucking up bash's essential behaviour comes to mind. It happened once. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh