On 11 Oct 2003, at 12:33, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How do you know that there's nothing new in messages you HAVE NOT > > READ? > > That's blacklisting. > > How do you know that Manoj didn't read them?
Because I put a couple kilobytes of new stuff in my second message (second after the bug reopening) in answer to a "polite request" by another user (Burrows) requesting more details on whatsamatta with this 'K' & 'Q' quorum stuff. The dull details Burrows asked for are in there, and those are pretty much "on topic". There was even a suggested revision. Surely we can't blame poor old Manoj for not wanting to peruse more tedious posts that he's afraid just go nowhere, or I can't blame him anyway -- there's a million books and posts I don't want to read either. What's not cricket is to ignore a report then to close it on the prejudice that it lacks what it did and does indeed contain. That's blacklisting.
