Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In this case, I believe you're confused about what the DFSG says about > trademarks. > > DFSG #4 very clearly states: /The license may require derived works to > carry a different name or version number from the original software.
That's fine on the work's own name. What about included artwork and other marks? Often, people are unhappy about compelled removals and it seems a rather "last resort" escape route. If it's possible to have a DFSG-friendly trademark licence for non-names, that would be really good and help sort out the infringement of the debian mark within debian without non-free licensing by consequence. -- MJ Ray (slef), K. Lynn, England, email see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
