MJ Ray wrote: >That's fine on the work's own name. What about included artwork >and other marks? > That is an interesting point. If such works are there for /functional /purposes *not* related to perception of the brand - for example if they are components of documentation or icons in the user interface, then trademark is misapplied to them. It seems appropriate that we could have a policy on such misapplication. But it should make careful note of the acceptable use of trademarks for brand perception.
Thanks Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]