On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:40:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:00:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > As far as I remember, the experiment has two steps, paying Steve for a > > month and paying Andi for a month. Steve's month is already over, and > > Andi is like in his third week. So - again - as far as I remember > > there is only one week of experiment left in _any_ case so it does not > > make too much sense talking about continuing or not. It's over soon > > anyway. > > > > If I'm wrong, please correct me. > > You're not. > > There's still logistical issues (getting the money to Steve and Andi, > dealing with taxes and whatnot -- they haven't been paid in advance) > that have to be sorted out but they're entirely a matter for the Dunc > board to deal with. Personally, I don't consider the experiment over > 'til all those loose ends are tied up; and it could easily turn out that > the logistical issues alone are enough of a problem to make this sort > of endeavour not worth the effort.
What about the analysis and resulting conclusion, report, whatever of this experiment ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]