Bill Allombert dijo [Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:09:22PM +0000]: > I am concerned you missed all the QA work and other works done by what you > call "anti-payment" people. Never so much work was done prior to a > release. It certainly show there are enough people willing to invest > effort in the release without dunc-tank bait. Byt the way, my release > date for Etch is "When it is ready". > > You have to consider that Dunc-tank created a conflict of interest for > every developer not strictly neutral about it and this is not a > comfortable position to be. > > Given the current prospect for Etch, "we can do this better, and look, > we'll prove it" is not even challenging.
Stop splitting everything in bands. Both sides are doing QA work - Maybe what should be measured (if it could, in a world much different than the one we live in) is whether putting money in speeded up or sloweed down the release - By this, I mean QA work and overall QA level. But as I said in an earlier message, that will never be completely, reliably measurable. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]