On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 08:45:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:44:55AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > So sorry, but I don't buy a single word of your argumentation here. > > It wasn't an argument; it was just a statement of things are, as I see > them. In so far as "how things are" isn't well communicated in those > areas, I don't see any other way of addressing that other than the above. > > > We're far beyond trying to help them, at least for me, [...] > > Your opinions are only ever going to be considered in so far as you're > willing to help make them a reality. If you're not willing to help, > find something else to worry about.
Given how gently help offers are treated, yes I'm beyond that. Blame yourself for that. That's also a very nice attempt to make me look bad and divert the discussion from its real matter. Sadly for you, I don't refuse to help, _you_ implied that I was part of a clever cabal to take over [EMAIL PROTECTED] So yes, awkwardly enough I don't consider helping DSA anymore, given what publicity I had in return. And like Marc said, when things in a project make people not care anymore, maybe the inherent problem is to be fixed, and not the people to be blamed. You don't fix a problem by hiding/blaming the symptoms. Thanks for caring. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpTEryiuo0IU.pgp
Description: PGP signature