Hey, why not? A third idea: instead of having delegates or a committee
or whatever to decide amongst disputes, how about randomly selecting a
jury from DDs and having their word (on who's right, on what punishment
is plausible) be absolutely final, with no appeal, ever?
I don't like it at first read, but you may provide examples of
situations where such a procedure could be useful. In particular, just
determining "who's right" doesn't help much. As for determining what
punishments are plausible, isn't this better done by a committee
specialized in the Constitution?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
