On Thu, May 31, 2007, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > I don't like it at first read, but you may provide examples of > situations where such a procedure could be useful. In particular, just > determining "who's right" doesn't help much. As for determining what > punishments are plausible, isn't this better done by a committee > specialized in the Constitution?
I'd prefer we didn't use the word "punishment", because punishing is certainly not what Debian should do; Debian needs to protect itself from threats, and this protection might mean expulsion, suspension or other unfortunate measures, but they should always be means against future harm rather than punishment for previous acts. Regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
