Anthony Towns writes ("Two GR concepts for dicussion"):
> I think the process should involve:
> [...]This sounds like a good idea to me. One thing that would be really helpful would be an ability for a Maintainer of this kind to make updates without review iff it can be shown to be safe. (Where `safe' means `the Maintainer gets to screw over people who run this program, but not anyone who doesn't.) I'm not sure exactly what the criteria would be but basically you'd diff the previous and new packages and allow only certain kinds of changes (eg, changes to existing programs in /usr/bin would be fine). Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
