Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 23/06/09 at 14:29 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >>> I'd be perfectly fine with FD being the last review step, and DAM >>> "just" in charge of creating the account, trusting FD judgement. >>> >>> What would we be missing that way? >> What you miss is that I move all problematic candidates to DAM with the >> comment >> "I'm not entirely happy, but its your job to decide..." >> Also it is good to have more than one person read the mboxes, sometimes you >> just >> miss important points/words because you're braindead after reading too many >> mails. > > If there are too many emails, maybe you should reduce the number of > emails by reducing the number of questions asked?
No. The number of emails rises only if candidates don't answer in a useful way and the AM needs to ask back. Otherwise the number of emails is more than low enough. Looking at the last good mbox there're 7 mails to read as all the questions were answered perfectly. And this is what one should expect as the questions are definitely not hard. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org