Daniel Pocock writes ("Re: Position statements short of a GR - DPL statements"):
> On 28/12/12 15:25, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I disagree this is a good idea/road but I'm not motivated anymore
> > to discuss this further.
> >
> > Anybody can say anything anyhow and so can the DPL. Extending this
> > blankly and blindly is not wise, IMO.> Ian's email [1] suggests two possible ways forward: > > a) ensuring open and transparent disclosure (even if identities are > concealed), which at the very least would "make sure nothing like this > can ever happen again" My message was nothing to do with Debconf and I assume Holger's reply wasn't either. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20708.10155.458004.970...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
