Gerfried Fuchs writes ("Re: Please update the DSA delegation"): > Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> [2013-12-05 03:32:19 CET]: > > In most cases, well-functioning teams will make non-controversial > > nominations, and the DPL will accept them without question. But that's > > *not* the same thing as the delegation being a "rubber stamp". > > Maybe I get you wrong - and maybe you got Lucas wrong - but are you > implying that Hector is a controversial nomination? Where did I miss > that part? From what I read in Lucas initial response to Martin, it was > about general communication issues with the (current) DSA team (wheter > or not that might be true), not with Hector specificly. The way you > phrase it makes it rather sound that Hector is a controversial > nomination?
Perhaps we are just having a misunderstanding of the phrase "rubber stamp". What I meant to say is that (even if the DPL hasn't explicitly asked the team to manage its own membership) when things are working reasonably well I would expect the DPL to routinely and quickly approve uncontroversial appointments (if I may borrow your word). I'm not saying that the DPL doesn't have a discretion. To me the phrase "rubber stamp" means an approval which in principle could be withheld but which we all predict will be granted (and, probably, granted without a deep investigation of the issues). It seems to me that Hector's appointment to DSA ought to fall in this category, unless there's something going on that I'm missing. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/21152.38130.922587.186...@chiark.greenend.org.uk