On 5/26/14, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael Gilbert <[email protected]> writes: >> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > >>> We could combine both features, though: set a term length of two years, >>> and then say that people can serve for two terms in succession but then >>> have to leave the committee for at least one term. > >> 8 seems like it would be near ideal: turnover is dealt with only about >> once per year, it is close to the average of the existing members terms >> (7.385 years), and it's likely close the historical average (although I >> haven't calculated that, would be interesting for someone to research). > > I don't think this achieves the goal of rotating more project members > through the TC.
If that be a worthy goal (I'm not commenting on this), then how about increasing the number of seats (maintaining an odd number of course)? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caosgnst_u213hfbk+2rm_xad3pghe1cp_1aerv_u_wh4hwi...@mail.gmail.com
