Scott Kitterman writes ("Re: Formal declaration of weak package ownership in source packages (was: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)"): > These changes will require, at the very least, policy changes. We > have a process for that. > > Unless this thing is somehow opt-in only, be prepared for a GR overriding it.
It might be best to do it via a GR anyway. > P. S. In case you wonder how maintainerless works, go look at the dusty > corners of the Ubuntu archive. I'm not in favour of abolishing amintainership. You don't explicitly say so but I get the impression from your mail that you think what I am suggesting is a bad idea. I've read your other messages in this thread and they have significantly influenced my thinking. So perhaps I have misunderstood you. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.