Jonathan Dowland writes ("Re: Debian contributor Register of Interests"): > I'm not sure how to word it but I felt that it was appropriate to > disclose that I work for Red Hat (Even though I do not work on RHEL > or Fedora), since Red Hat produces something "similar" to Debian, or > more specifically a third party could hypothetically allude that it > was in Red Hat's interests for Debian to make a particular technical > decision. (I didn't see this rationale on your list)
Yes. I guess I missed out: * Being paid to work on free software more generally > > I would like to settle the boundaries before we start populating the > > list. > > I respect that, but I hope that those who are happy to add > themselves to the list as it stands are not dissuaded from doing so > (in my view, I'd happily see the shape of the list evolve and adapt > my entry to fit as necessary). Right. TBH I now think this may be too much work. I guess I will just write my own entry and we can see how it evolves. > > The list should have a date at which the user's entry was last > > updated and signed off by them as complete. > > The former can be inferred from the wiki page history. Well, it's a bit awkward. And it just shows you the last edit, not the last time the user themselves thought it was up to date. Ian.