Hi Jonathan, and Happy New Year! On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 10:38:58PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: >On 2019/01/01 22:22, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
... >> (for clarity, that was part of the original GR that validated the code >> of conduct) >> >> I don't think it's a stretch (at all!) to claim that Planet Debian falls >> under the "other modes of communication" bit there. > >Yes absolutely, I didn't mean to imply anything of the contrary. I just >brought it up because I think it would be a good idea to link to the CoC >from the PlanetDebian wiki page. Absolutely. Make it so! >>> I think what I miss a bit in the Planet rules is the "Be respectful" >>> part and the "Be careful in the words that you choose. Be kind to >>> others. Do not insult or put down other participants. Harassment and >>> other exclusionary behavior aren't acceptable." Making it clear that you >>> cannot always agree, but that personal attacks are unacceptable. >> >> I think the code of conduct states those things too (although in other >> formulations), and just updating the Planet rules to clarify that the >> code of conduct applies should be enough? > >I think it's part of it. > >I really do think it's also worth while to explicitly have a short part >stating what the planet is not appropriate for, stating that it's not >appropriate to use the planet to republish personal arguments or smear >campaigns. Sure, that would also be against the CoC, but it will make it >much more easier to remove posts that do things like that rather than >having to rely on an interpretation of the CoC every time that matter >comes up. Sounds reaonable, yes. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb." -- Steven M. Haflich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
