❦ 23 juillet 2019 19:05 +01, Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com>: >>3- Mandating using Salsa as a Git repository. >> >>I do believe #1 will pass easily, but that it's useless without #2, and >>there is some kind of uncertainty. For #3, I'm not even sure we should >>vote for that, I probably even prefer it not to be voted for myself, >>though what's annoying me is having to pull some packaging from non-free >>services such as Github, and this would make an end to it. > > There are genuinely good reasons for *not* using salsa. If the debian > packaging is directly included as part of the upstream git repo(s) > somewhere else, for example. It's a good thing to encourage salsa > usage (and I agree 100% with that for most things), but let's not > argue about making things mandatory please.
git being distributed, you can still push to Salsa too. I don't know the first thing about Fedora, but they have everything in one place [0] and I can take a look, browse through history, it seems I can contribute with just a PR and all packages have the CI plugged in. [0]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/ -- Use library functions. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
