On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 08 apr 20, 19:40:27, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 14:30:43 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > > > Hi Zhu > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 07:50:22PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > > 1. Can you still keep the "-guest" enforcement, so it's still easy to > > > > recognize who is DD or not on salsa? > > > > > > No. The guest suffix was meant to avoid collisions with Debian > > > accounts. And the tool used to enforce it is unmaintained. > > > > > I think avoiding collisions with debian accounts is still valuable, and > > the proposal doesn't explain why removing this protection is in any way > > related or necessary for other services to use salsa as auth providers. > > I must be missing something so I'm asking: what is the *benefit* of > avoiding collisions with Debian accounts? > f...@salsa.debian.org and f...@debian.org both existing and referring to different people risks causing confusion. I'd like to understand why we're going that way.
Cheers, Julien