On 9/16/22 9:42 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 08:47:19AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > > On 9/16/22 12:12 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > Well, sometimes bugs do sit around for a bit, yes; but you are presenting > > > it in > > > a much way that it makes the situation look worse than it actually is. > > > The resolution is quick quite a few times (to my > > > experience and I am a DD myself) but yes, sometimes they do sit around > > > for a while. > > > > That's easy to explain why your bugs are fixed quickly. You are a DD, so > > your > > bugs are important. I am not a DD so my bugs are not as important to the > > maintainers who have a greater responsibility to respond to a DD's bug than > > to an unknown user's bug. > > That's a completely wrong interpretation that you are drawing here. No, that's > not really the reason here. > The reason is rather that people _do_ work on bug reports regardless of > who reported them, but you somehow do not want to acknowledge the fact that > package maintainers do work on bug reports. > > > That is the way it should be. > > No, that should not be that way, it'd be _very_ wrong. If that was actually > the > case we would be violating the debian social contract point 4 > > "Our priorities are our users and free software" > > > No problem here, and > > please no one reply and say I am complaining. I am not. I am just seeing > > how things work at Debian and I think they work fairly well. > > You are seeing it in completely incorrect ways. > > ... > > FWIW, even my bug reports have been lying to take actions for long times, so > it is not just you.
What severity are they? The one I am talking about is marked as important, I did not report it nor did I mark it as important, but a kernel maintainer marked it as important. I want to help close it, and some here seem to say I can help fix it, but others, like you, do not want me to help fix it. Best regards, Chuck
