Neil Schemenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > python_2.1.1 > python1.5_1.5.2 > zope2.3.3
Why not python-1.5_1.5.2, zope-2.3.3 and similar binary packages? I think this namenumber scheme is ugly and it looks strange. name-version is more clear IMO. > These create the following binary packages: > > python-base > python-dev > python-elisp Why not python instead of python? I want to be able to "apt-get install python" and "dpkg -p python". Then python could confilct with python-base, and in that way force all old module packages that depend on python-base to get updated to their new version that depend on python (>= 1.5), python (<<1.6). /Micce -- Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176 Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home) Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden +46 (0)70 5891533 (mobile) [gpg key fingerprint = 387F A8DB DC2A 50E3 FE26 30C4 5793 29D3 C01B 2A22]