On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 02:30 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > 1) Best to cc the wnpp bugreport on such messages, so that when someone looks > into re2c, s/he'll notice your work.
Oops. I did send a message+patch to the "please update to new upstream" bug, forgot the wnpp bug tho. I now note that on the wnpp bug there is now someone who wants to take over the package: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=320283;msg=12 Should I tell them about what I have done and how to go about adopting the package? > 2) you introduce quite some stuff that probably should have been cleaned in > the clean target, like stamp files, .deps/*.Po files, etc... Please make sure > your clean target removes all autogenerated files. > > Also, you don't need to ship a prerm that solely has a debhelper token, you > can then simply omit it and debhelper will put its stuff if needed into the > package as prerm anyway. Same for postinst. Fixed these and more, new package on debian mentors. I guess I assumed that automake would take care of the autogenerated files. -- bye, pabs http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Paul+Wise&comaint=yes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
