Mark Purcell <m...@debian.org> writes: > I don't think the issue is the removal of the translations, rather the > fact that the locale-code hne isn't defined in ISO 639-1 & ISO 639-2.
> My reading of Chhattisgarhi_language[1] shows that the ISO 639-3 code is > "hne", whilst the ISO 639-2 code for this family is "inc". > I am raising this as an inconsistency. If we are accepting ISO 639-3 > locales then that is fine too and we will fix lintian. I suspect that we should be accepting ISO 639-3 codes as well as -1 and -2 codes. inc looks like a catch-all that wouldn't be very useful for the end user in language selection. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ochtv56d....@windlord.stanford.edu
