On Monday 16 June 2014 12:43:25 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Great -- thanks Sune for the feedback. It is just from previous > comments I was not sure if KDE is still relying/using virtuoso. > But if you state so -- must be so.
There is a move away from virtuoso - but the kde stack in stable uses virtuoso and if users should have a chance to migrate their data out, they need a kde stack that can communicate with it. > Do you think it would be feasible to proceed for now with a > versioned (e.g. virtuoso-7) source package for virtuoso while excluding > all the non-versioned meta- packages, thus providing recent virtuoso for > those users who want it, while keeping KDE team and users happy? If everytihng is properly versioned, I don't see a issue with providing an extra source package, and we could probably even strip down the kde-virtuoso source package from a lot of the 'generic components'. It is really just the odbc driver and the virtuoso executable that kde relies on. I think patches would be more than welcome. > what components of KDE require virtuoso? (only napomuk?) and which > tools/libraries in particular? It is the nepomuk/soprano chain that requires it. and it is used by the activities system, by the file manager (dolphin), the image viewer (gwenview), the mail stack and probably some I forgotten. But everything is happening thru nepomuk and soprano. oh. and the Debian Krap Team is for packages we don't really love but have to care for anyways. /Sune -- I didn’t stop pretending when I became an adult, it’s just that when I was a kid I was pretending that I fit into the rules and structures of this world. And now that I’m an adult, I pretend that those rules and structures exist. - zefrank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/3935793.AoBqhoBoSR@dabney
