On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:00PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Hi, > > gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 was build with the configure option > --disable-__cxa_atexit instead of --enable-__cxa_atexit. This > causes it to have a different C++ ABI. > > This was fixed in the 3.3.5-10 which should be available soon. > > I've made a list of source packages that might have been build > with the 3.3.5-9 version so far. This is based on all packages > uploaded after the gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 package. This is a list of > source package who have a binary package with a dependency on the > libstdc++5 package. Is there anyway to detect the breakage? Is running the program enough?
What about the buildds, has gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 been installed on one of them? -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
