On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:00PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 was build with the configure option
> --disable-__cxa_atexit instead of --enable-__cxa_atexit.  This
> causes it to have a different C++ ABI.
> 
> This was fixed in the 3.3.5-10 which should be available soon.
> 
> I've made a list of source packages that might have been build
> with the 3.3.5-9 version so far.  This is based on all packages
> uploaded after the gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 package.  This is a list of
> source package who have a binary package with a dependency on the
> libstdc++5 package.
Is there anyway to detect the breakage? Is running the program enough?

What about the buildds, has gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 been installed on one of
them?



-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno             | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED]         | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to