Riku Voipio wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:10:05AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > lsh-utils 2.0-1 needed, have 1.4.2-8.2 for CAN-2005-0389 > > > lsh-utils 2.0.1-1 needed, have 1.4.2-8.2 for CAN-2005-0814 > > > (Also has a RC bug though.) > > > yeah, that doesn't sound like a win yet (though it's also built on m68k). > > lsh-utils has following, worrying description: > > --snip-- > Description: Secure Shell v2 (SSH2) protocol server > .... > WARNING: This is a work in progress, and may be totally insecure. > --snip-- > > If the description is not out of date (It hasn't changed since last > stable), is this really something that should go to sarge?
Since it's in woody already, yes. Regards, Joey -- Life is too short to run proprietary software. -- Bdale Garbee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]