Hi, On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:36:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:59:01AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > * Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:12:05PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > > > Looks like James is no longer interested in maintaining gnupg. He > > > > doesn't respond to bugreports, and he also didn't respond to mails > > > > from the release managers where they asked him if a newer version > > > > of gnupg should get pushed into sarge. > > I would be doubly wary of letting a new upstream version of a package into > testing as an NMU. If James agrees that 1.4.1 is the way to go for sarge, I > would probably be willing to go with it since we know gnupg gets heavily > exercised by developers; otherwise, I think we're going to need backports > for the bugs in question.
What are you going to do if James continues to ignore you as it seems to be the case from Norbert's narrative? Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]