On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:46:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Well, at least one user seems to think that 304245 is important enough to be > worth fixing; if you agree with him, then it's fine to allow this fix in via > unstable. That wouldn't apply to whatever low-priority fixes upstream has > thrown into 4.1.4, however.
So you're basically saying I should upload a 4.1.4beta2 with just the fix for #304245 (assuming I can backport it easily -- I haven't checked yet), but that the entire 4.1.4 wouldn't be accepted into sarge? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
