On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:14:03PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >Nevertheless, since when all is said and done the only thing that kept > >libosip2 2.2.0 out of sarge was a spurious upload to change the maintainer > >field, and siproxd missed the freeze by one day, I'm (provisionally) > >approving both to get back into sarge.
> >As for linphone, that package has been uploaded far too recently to get the > >same exception. > Well, the 1.0.1-1 package was uploaded the 2005-03-25 and since then > I've only made minor corrections of the package or patchs to handle > small bugs which are very unlikely to have broken the package. The main > reason why linphone is not in sarge now is beacause it has been held by > the RC bug on libosip2. > I'm insisting only because some users have asked me for linphone to be > into sarge. Yes, and I would be a potential of linphone packages in sarge; but getting new packages into testing is a very low priority right now compared to everything else that *needs* to be done for the release, and I don't expect that the release team will have time to give packages such as this proper consideration before release. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
