On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It > > fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff > > is included below). > > There are no bugs in the BTS regarding those issues. > > Approved.
Sorry to come up with cpufreqd again: I built 1.2.3-2 that adds one more debconf template translation (Vietnamese) but before uploading I'd like to hear thoughts about the possibility to push it again in order not to block 1.2.3-1 from entering sarge. A snippet from changes file ,--------------------------- | Closes: 310147 310149 | Changes: | cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high | . | * Added Vietnamese debconf translation (closes: #310147) | * Corrected a typo in debconf templates (also cleared in translations) | (closes: #310149) `--------------------------- Also, is urgency=high ok in case of positive answers? thanks -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]