> > IIRC, the second release of 2.1 was called 2.1r2 to avoid the confusion I > am in the process of creating. We may mean the "r" to mean "revision", > but many people would interpret it as "release" and so would see 2.2 as > being identical with 2.2r1. >
But still, if we are going to make that assumption, then we should call this one 2.2r1, and not skip the nomenclature. It's confusing. -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
