Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 07:44:11PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > zope updates 2.8-15.3 arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> > Security update, DSA 041
> > Packages uploaded, waiting for dinstall
>
> zope 2.1.6-7 is the latest in proposed-updated, 2.3.0-4 is the latest in
> unstable. There's some sort of typo there, dunno what. The security team
> uploaded 2.1.6-5.3 and -5.4, -6 and -7 were uploaded by the maintainer. The
> latter has the lovely reassuring comment:
>
> * Include Hotfix_2001-02-23, Hotfix_2000-10-11, Hotfix_2000-10-02
> and Hotfix_08_09_2000. I hope they don't have bad side-effects in
> this ancient 2.1.6 version.
>
> -7 is on security.d.o. So I'll assume that's what you meant. Actually, no
> need to assume, you mention it later. Dunno what the above was meant to be
> at all then.
You were working on an old file. Smack it. Proper is:
zope updates 2.1.6-7 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
Security upload, DSA 043
-7 is the only proper version, all others were broken or incomplete in
one or the other way.
> > nextaw updates 0.5.1-34potato1 i386, m68k
> > nextawg updates 0.5.1-34potato1 i386, m68k
> > xaw3dg-dev updates 1.3-6.9potato1 i386, m68k
> > xaw3dg updates 1.3-6.9potato1 i386, m68k
> > xaw3d updates 1.3-6.9potato1 i386, m68k
> > xaw3dg-dev updates 1.3-6.9potato1 i386, m68k
> > xaw3dg updates 1.3-6.9potato1 i386, m68k
> > xaw3d updates 1.3-6.9potato1 i386, m68k
> > Security update, DSA 037
>
> The sparc autobuilder built this too, but it doesn't appear to have
> made it to security.d.o, and maybe it should? I'll assume it goes in too
> as far as r3 is concerned.
They're uploaded now, I thought they were not buildable anymore.
> > ecpg updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > libpgperl updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > libpgsql2 updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > libpgtcl updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > odbc-postgresql updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > pgaccess updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > postgresql-client updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > postgresql-contrib updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > postgresql-dev updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > postgresql-doc updates 6.5.3-25 all
> > postgresql-pl updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > postgresql-test updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > postgresql updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
> > python-pygresql updates 6.5.3-25 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc,
> > sparc
>
> postgresql 6.5.3-25 has been replaced by 6.5.3-26 on i386, m68k and
> powerpc. Not sure offhand if it's better to resurrect the -25 debs from
> the morgue.
Are they still there? They're not in the pool, right?
I'm not sure either. However, the first prerm bug seems nasty
and I believe that Oliver is concious enough for -26, though
arch's are not in sync anymore :(
> > proftpd updates 1.2.0pre10-2.0potato1 arm, i386, m68k, sparc
> > proftpd updates 1.2.0pre10-2.0potato1.1 powerpc
>
> proftpd -2.0potato1 is an NMU by Ivo Timmermans, that fixes a string format
> buffer attack, changes the user/group it runs as and
> does some other random things.
> proftpd -2potato1 is a security upload by Michael Stone, fixing a string
> format problem, and USER and SIZE memory leaks.
>
> the -2.0potato1 is what's actually in the archive, but doesn't appear to
> be based on mstone's upload according to the changelog. Both appear to
> have made it onto security.d.o, so I guess we just go with the -2.0potato1
> version. Dodgy.
No comment.
> > Rejected packages
> > -----------------
>
> > distributed-net updates 2.8012-potato3 i386, powerpc, sparc
> > No security update
> > Changelog doesn't make me believe that these fixes have to go
> > into stable. It's contrib anyway.
>
> It's actually non-free, not contrib. The maintainer says that we ought to
> be doing this in order to be allowed to distribute it at all; I'm inclined
> to allow that in. (In any event, it's non-free, so it doesn't much matter
> if it breaks things)
Status changed.
> > ibcs-base stable 981105-1 i386
> > ibcs-base updates 981105-1 sparc
> >
> > Get versions in sync
>
> This was in the Reject half of your email, I guess because ibcs-base wasn't
> available for sparc in stable previously. I'm inclined to let it in anyway.
> At the very least, the same package is in testing/unstable and doesn't seem
> to have generated any huge number of bugs.
Ups, wrong directory, fixed. Let's get it in.
> > watchdog updates 5.1-2 arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> >
> > I'm not convinced by this changelog why it should go into stable:
> >
> > * Uploaded to stable, adds --noscripts to debhelper invocation, closes:
> > #53298, #61939 (grave).
> >
> > alpha version still missing
> >
> > Maintainer: Johnie Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 61939 seems to indicate that upgrades to 5.1-0.3 can potentially crash the
> machine because the watchdog daemon gets disabled. That's probably a decent
> reason.
You're reading an old version, current is:
watchdog updates 5.1-2 alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
This upload fixes a broken version in potato which may result
in the watchdog rebooting the machine during the upgrade.
1. Watchdog daemon is stopped
2. A whole lot of packages are unpacked
3. (sometimes) dpkg stops and prompts you to overwrite
/etc/watchdog.conf
4. Watchdog daemon is restarted
And it is in the accept-list.
> > xcal updates 4.1-9 alpha, i386, powerpc, sparc
> > Misplaced upload, mentions 'stable unstable', changelog says:
> > * closes Bug#80504 (pscal gets January 2001 wrong!)
> > * cleaned up debian/ directory and updated standards
> > arm and m68k missing
> > Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> arm's not missing anymore; a calendar program getting days of a month wrong
> seems a decent thing to fix.
Ok, moved to 'further investigation', m68k is still missing.
> > xtide updates 2.2a-1 i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> > I don't see a reason why this package should make it into stable.
> > Changelog:
> >
> > * The Debian source archive xtide_2.2.orig.tar.gz was not pristine and
> > included tidal harmonics data downloaded from the XTide web site.
> > It was recently discovered that some of the data included in the above
> > archive may be in violation of copyright. Therefore, XTide's author
> > removed the data in question from his web site and produced new
> > harmonics files which were included in this 2.2a Debian version.
>
> Copyright violations seem a good reason to pull/fix a package.
You're still reading an old version, it's already on the accept-list.
> > yaboot updates 0.9-0.30-3 powerpc
> > Misplaced upload, mentions "stable unstable"
>
> It's an upload of a powerpc specific package made by Dan J, though.
See above, it's on the accept list as well.
The current list is found at http://master.debian.org/~joey/2.2r3/status.txt
Regards,
Joey
--
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
