On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:19:11PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > >... > > That could be done either by a rebuild, or, less costly, by a simple > > unpack/edit-changelog/repack. > > Repacking breaks with every > Depends: somepackage (= ${Source-Version})
Ah yes. And it's possibly not the only way it could break, so we'd have to rebuild. That starts to be a costly mechanism... > > In that case, if we had libfoo0_1.0-1 in pre-testing, and > > libfoo0_1.0-2 in unstable, we'd end up with libfoo0_1.0-2.0.1 in > > pre-testing, and libfoo0_1.0-2.0.2 in unstable, whether the latter was > > rebuilt or just repacked. > > These version numbers are currently assigned to binary only NMUs, it > would create big confusion if they were also used for a different > purpose. But binary NMUs are not much different from what I'm proposing, especially if we're rebuilding each of these packages, or do I miss something ? Regards, -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ? Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux: Pro: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>