On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 12:34:32PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > (OK, so let's try out replying via the mailing-lists links. Sorry if > this turns out bad) > > Matthias Klose writes: > > > hmm, upload a new gcc-defaults to experimental making 3.4 the default > > definitely breaks gnome builds in experimental, if you get your build > > dependencies from there. an experimental/toolchain would help in this > > case. > > Perhaps one can assume that all essential and build-essential packages > should be from unstable, while the build-dependencies are taken from > experimental?
If that's the idea, why would you ever upload a compiler to experimental? -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature