On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 11:24:12AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:25:20PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:58:06PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > > There was no final decision if we ship 2.4.27 with sarge.
> > I wonder what needs to happen to have a formal d-k decision. > > Do other subgroups of Debian have a mechanism for this? Maybe we > > need a designated person or persons who can speak for each arch. > > (Please only reply to debian-kernel on this topic). > Well, ultimately, the decision is with the RMs. But i guess you are as > good as any to take that decision. We depend on the experts (the kernel team) for the information we need in order to make good decisions -- or better, to help *you* make good decisions. Based on this thread and other discussions, I understand that the current 2.4.26 packages are unsuitable for release because of security bugs, and it looks like the new 2.4.27 packages are closer to being in a releasable state than 2.4.26 is. Compared with this, the NEW delays are minor; I'm happy to stick out my neck to get the 2.4.27 packages processed faster if I know the effort won't be wasted. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
