On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:32:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Also, hdf5 depends on lam, which also had to do its own transition, and
> > that adds the following additional packages:
> > Package: libxmpi4
> > Package: netpipe-lam
> > Package: r-cran-rmpi
> > Package: xmpi
> lam has now been uploaded with optimization lowered, which will hopefully
> correct the problem with m68k, but it looks like the package is failing
> on nearly all the buildds due to another problem:
> mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/bin
> cd $(dirname $(find -name lamclean -perm +u+x -type f |grep -v debian)) && mv
> -f lamclean lamclean.old && ( /usr/bin/make -n lamclean | awk '/mkdir/ {next}
> /libtool/ { gsub("[^
> ]*liblam\\.la","-L'/build/buildd/lam-7.1.1/debian/tmp/usr/lib' -llam -ldl");
> gsub("[^ ]*libmpi\\.la","-L'/build/buildd/lam-7.1.1/debian/tmp/usr/lib' -llam
> -ldl"); gsub(" lamclean ","
> '/build/buildd/lam-7.1.1/debian/tmp/usr/bin/lamclean' "); print}' | bash -x
> -e || (mv lamclean.old lamclean && false)) && mv lamclean.old lamclean
^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah, that'll be that crazy upstream findutils change that breaks -perm
+foo in the name of POSIX.. According to the thread on debian-devel, the
new syntax is apparently -perm /foo. :P
> The hdf5 and mpich portions of the migration look to be in better shape,
> although I'm going to take a more detailed look shortly.
Glad to hear it!
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
