Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:22:52AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> Please forward this whereever appropriate. >> The following packages were built against the libpng with overly strict >> shlibs on one or more architectures, and to ease testing transition >> problems, binNMUs are desired. > >> (See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/10/msg00149.html ) > >> libwxgtk2.4-dev (m68k, source is wxwindows) > > m68k is the one arch we can't do binNMUs on yet. We're also ignoring it > for testing transitions, so there's not really a hurry either. Hmm, is britney clever enough to notice that and allow libpng in? I guess so.
>> libgdk-pixbuf2 (arm, source is gdk-pixbuf) > > Already been queued; it failed, given back again. Looks like it built. >> gif2png (arm) > > Queued. Arm is struggling to keep up right now, so it may take a bit for > a build to happen. Looks like it built. >> gdk-imlib11 (sparc, source is imlib) > > Also queued. Looks like it built. >> dillo (sparc -- but deserves rebuild on all arches for new openssl) > > only i386 and ia64 have a dependency on libssl0.9.7. Queued on these > three archs. > >> ygraph (arm, sparc) > > Also queued. > >> You know, that's a much shorter list than I thought it would be. > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?staller=libpng suggests that > there's opportunity to add to this list, though I don't know how many of > these packages we need to worry about just yet. All of the ones I checked are indirect deps via one of the above packages. That was the pleasant surprise. -- Nathanael Nerode Random sig chooser not working today -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]