Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, buildd admins are responsible for fixing buildd problems. *Porters* are > responsible for *ensuring their port is a viable release candidate*. Given > that one of the release criteria is "keeping up with unstable", porters most > definitely *are* expected to help make sure packages are getting built.
I think the problem is that if the buildds don't talk to the porters, and the porters aren't allowed to upload binNMUs themselves, then they are essentially barred from their assigned task. How about we make porters responsible for running their buildds instead of the current arrangement? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
