Daniel Baumann writes: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > So why is it "absolutely not buildable"? > > See #309121, the asm part of hxclient depends on gcc 3.x. Nobody, > including upstream, wants or can fix it to comply with 4.x. Anyway, Real > instead works on a complete rewrite for helix player 2. Until this is > ready, helix-player 1.x ist lost with gcc 3.x. > > Why not close the bug? Removal of gcc 3.x is not a release-target for > etch, and for etch+1 there will be helix-player 2.x available hopefully ;)
if we do have the choice to remove the g++-3.4 package or just the helix-player package, I'd rather prefer to remove the helix-player package. helix-player isn't a release target as well. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]