On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:39:37PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:06:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > > It's not even RC at all, just a badly configured buildd. They should > > > > be using linux32. > > > > > > No, it is configured correctly. The buildd provides a build environment > > > which matches the standard configuration for this architecture. > > > > Except uname -m gives s390x instead of s390... > > It matches _a_ standard configuration, IOW, uname is an unreliable > indicator.
Bastian said "_the_ standard configuration". Anyways, I'm not responsible for upstream using uname... I'm trying to get a fix for the issue but I have higher priority things I'd like to work on before release... Thus I'm asking if that can be treated ignore-etch... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
