Hi Markus, Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch> (2017-07-03): > On 07/02/2017 11:14 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > sorry, I misunderstood this as you asking for an upload of deb8u2.
No worries, we'll see what to do. > >>> (Also, you should be targetting “jessie” directly instead of > >>> “stable”.) > > (Just out of curiosity: is there a difference between uploading to > "jessie" versus (now) "oldstable"?) Codenames are preferred: they work all the time, and there's no possible confusion about the distribution you want to upload to. > > When a pu request is marked with +moreinfo, you're supposed to be > > giving feedback. Uploads should only happen after you're given a > > green light (through a +confirmed). > > Okay, I'm sorry I didn't follow the procedures properly. > >> I just uploaded 3.0.0-5+deb8u2 for "jessie", as you asked for. > >> Including a very minor modification of the patch for it to compile, > >> again, as discussed with upstream. > > > > I did request the target change, but not really the upload; I still > > don't get why your changelog has a 3.0.0-5+deb8u1 entry which > > doesn't seem to have made it to the archive. > > I see 3.0.0-5+deb8u1 in oldstable: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/flightgear > https://packages.debian.org/source/oldstable/flightgear As pointed out by Adam in his follow-up, that hasn't reached jessie, but that's stuck in jessie/updates instead, from the security archive (which doesn't appear in rmadison/dak ls output quoted above). I'll see what to do once he's replied. KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
