Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu
I would like to ask for binNMUing 8 packages. All of them happen to be +b1 for mips64el and "normal" for all other architectures. Fixing these resolves all binNMU-induced skews affecting dependency satisfaction of source packages with popcon of at least 8000, so this limited set has a noticeable impact to cross build QA. I hope I got the wanna-build invocation right: nmu db5.3_5.3.28-13.1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch" nmu tcl8.6_8.6.7+dfsg-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch" nmu libjpeg-turbo_1:1.5.2-2 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch" nmu wayland_1.14.0-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch" nmu fftw3_3.3.6p2-2 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch" nmu nspr_2:4.16-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch" nmu libgudev_232-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch" nmu tk8.6_8.6.7-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch" Barring errors with binNMU handling of M-A:same packages, I don't expect to send more of such batches. This is the big fish to me. Most other skews I am seeing are caused by arch-specific FTBFS. Scheduling them at low priority is fine. QA will benefit as soon as they hit unstable. Helmut