What's the situation with this one? Could it be included in the next Stretch update?
On Saturday, 9 December 2017 1:33:39 PM AEDT Russell Coker wrote: > On Saturday, 2 December 2017 11:05:24 AM AEDT Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > IFF it's versioned as 2:2.20161023.1-9+deb9u1, uses "stretch" as the > > changelog distribution, is otherwise identical to the diff presented in > > this bug log and is built and tested on a stretch system, then OK. > > I've attached a debdiff that only differs in file timestamps, the version > change you requested, and the changelog timestamp. > > I have tested it on my main mail server, one of my main web servers, one of > my minor mail servers, and a shell server. It passed all tests and did > everything as well as expected with no regressions. > > Please consider it for inclusion. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/