El 13/1/19 a les 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha escrit: > On 11/01/2019 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 11/01/2019 15:17, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>> Subject: transition: ode >>> Package: release.debian.org >>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >>> Usertags: transition >>> Severity: normal >>> >>> Dear release team, >>> >>> I would like to ask a transition slot for the ode library. Upstream >>> published a >>> new version with a soname bump. The affected packages can be build without >>> any >>> problem with the new version (I did it in an pbuilder environment). >>> >>> Please accept with transition slot. I know that is too close to Buster >>> freeze. >> >> Go ahead. > > And your package fails (and was already failing) to build on several release > architectures. You should have fixed that before requesting a transition slot. > > Please look at those failures: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ode >
First of all I'm so sorry. I didn't check the build of the package because I thought that it was built. I was more worried about the dependencies than the package itself. Upstream told me the there was no important changes. I check specially ABI changes. In any case, after I notice the problem I worked on. In some archs there was a problem in autotest, and in others an assert that for an check from upstream. The problem was in non common archs. I pushed a new version of the package yesterday night solving the issue in some archs and this morning I have pushed another version of the package with the patches sent by upstream. Also, some people in #debian-mentors helped me in this issue. Now, it builds in all the archs expect ia64 because some dependencies, not the package itself. I can only say this... -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature