Marc Dequènes (duck) writes ("Re: weboob, Gratuitous sexual references"): > *Unilaterally* taking decisions in a project
I feel I need to set the record straight. This decision was not taken unilaterally. The process was: * We had a conversation involving you as maintainer; you decided that unless upstream were convinced to change[1], the package should stay in Debian in its current form. * I disagreed with your decision as maintainer and raised the matter with various project officials to ask the correct route to address my concerns. * After discussion (including opinions from DPL, the release team, and others), the antiharassment team concluded that this was within their remit, discussed it amongst themselves, and recommended that the package, in its current form, should not be included in Debian. * That recommendation from AH was forwarded (via this bug) to the ftpmasters, who are actually finally responsible for such decisions. * Upstream were not convinced to change. ftpmaster decided to follow AH's recommendation. So ultimately, this decision was taken by the ftpmaster team, on recommendation from the AH team, with advice on process from the DPL. I think if you disagree, you may escalate to the TC or to a GR. > Sometimes it really feels bad to be in Debian… I'm sorry you feel that way. I don't think it was possible to resolve this disagreement without making someone feel like that. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.