On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:48:57PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:40:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:52:05AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:25:37PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > > > If my analysis/understanding is correct, icu, xerces27, boost, and > > > > parrot will need to be hinted into etch together but this is not yet > > > > possible because boost and parrot have other issues right now that > > > boost build looks screwed. pts also looks screwed. ehi.. also > > > http://people.debian.org/~igloo looks screwed... hmm... > > > it looks like boost is ready to enter testing but powerpc, mips, mipsel > > > and of course m68k are still missing. > > Where are you looking? > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=bcp > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/boost/ > http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/boost/ > http://debian.fastweb.it/debian/pool/main/b/boost/ I'm afraid I can't see anything out-of-date at this point. What I do see is: * unstable (libdevel): tool for extracting subsets of Boost C++ Libraries 1.33.1-7+b1: amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 s390 sparc 1.33.1-7: alpha kfreebsd-i386 m68k mips mipsel powerpc This shows that 7 architectures have been binNMUed, and 4 (release) architectures have not. This does not mean they're "missing", those architectures simply don't appear to require binNMUs as the -7 versions are already built with the correct version of icu. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
